Skip to main content

Language of Politics

09 February, 00:00
Do You Like How Our Politicians Talk?
In today's discussions on spirituality and mentality we pose the question of the culture of language. From the ancient philosophers to modern psychoanalysts there has been a theory that man's language and how he uses it determine not only his way of thinking, but even his innermost spiritual impulses. Thus it was not by accident that in trying to better understand political processes in Ukraine The Day turned to cultural figures, asking them a single question, "Do you like the way our politicians talk?" We asked them to concentrate on this alone, leaving aside political issues.

  Yaroslav STELMAKH, playwright:
Of course not. At one time I even wanted to make a glossary of their pearls of illiteracy and awkwardness. I even started it, but then gave up because it would take recording almost every speech. In my opinion, behind all this illiterate stilted verbiage and lamentable command of the Ukrainian language is their sheer contempt of the national audience and potential electorate. Language is not only a means of communication but also a way to convince others of one's views. Isn't this what every politician should be after? All things considered, the primitive manner in which they build and address their speeches must reflect their authors' vague amorphous ideas. Incidentally, of all those sitting in high offices today Viktor Yushchenko shows the best command of both the language and ideas, which is evidence of not only a good education, but also true professionalism.

  Mykola KANISHEVSKY, Chief Editor, Vikna (Window) Television Information Agency:
Most our politicians are tongue-tied, but there are also other examples. Two years ago Serhiy Tyhypko could not put two words together in Ukrainian, then he worked with a teacher and now he speaks the language quite well. This is evidence that if one wants to learn one can do it. It is also true, however, that a lot of politicians underestimate the importance of not only what they say, but also how they say it. There is an excellent example of a bilingual approach. Petro Symonenko, who speaks Russian and Ukrainian equally well, uses only Russian when voicing principled Communist views, for he understands that this language is his tactic addressed to a certain part of the electorate.

  Les TANIUK, Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Commission on Culture and Spiritual Values:
With rare exceptions it is difficult to speak of their high level of education or morality. Those in power are people far removed from both virtues. All it takes is a look at photos of the past three Parliaments. Each time there are fewer and fewer faces marked by intellect. Cultural issues are usually debated in Parliament on Fridays when it is easier to soft-pedal all the differences that arise. The vocabulary used by our major politicians is scanty and anemic. Their clumsy phraseology is presented as colloquial Ukrainian. Of course, there are well-educated people among them, but they do not take the floor for want of expletives. There is a Ukrainian saying: an empty barrel gives the loudest bang. In most cases speeches heard in Parliament are shallow, dominated by petty political emotions. Hearing the Speaker quote from GЪethe, I doubt that he had ever heard the name before someone added the passage to his text. A member of the government and I were at an commemorative evening in honor of Hrushevsky the other day. The event was to take place at the Opera House and the man wanted to know where the place was. I said everyone should know the National Opera's whereabouts and he replied, "Really? Would you know your way to Ukrkhlib (Ukrainian Grain) or Ukrtsukor (Ukrainian Sugar)?" What can one expect from such people?

  Yuri ILLIENKO, film director:
How can one like the way they speak? At least half the Deputies don't know how to use the language; they just poke through verbal garbage cans. Of course, there are different politicians. Some are prolix whoremongers, but most are as tongue-tied as our President. Natalia Vitrenko's Ukrainian is atrocious. With some reservations Oleksandr Moroz's could be considered model usage, whereas his predecessor Ivan Pliushch was simply a font of folklore. Mostly prison slang prevails in Parliament. Musicians, cinematographers and others have their special professional languages, and that our Deputies so skillfully use criminal argot simply gives one a feeling of tragedy.

  Serhiy KRYMSKY, philosopher:
I am certainly dissatisfied by the language of our politicians. I think that a politician must speak in a manner reflecting the modern vocabulary, and it is made up of at least three components: first, words bearing eternal notions and values, second, certain neologisms born of this epoch required to describe specific practical situations, and, third, the most representative modern scientific concepts. As for neologisms, our politicians have largely mastered them, but they seldom and ineffectively use classical and modern scientific terms. In general, the language of Ukrainian politicians betrays their poor knowledge of both Ukrainian and world culture. Also, I think this lack of knowledge is why they often say things they do not clearly understand - or just don't care what they say and how. Language is of utmost importance in representing individuality, as shown by ancient and modern history. We say that Charles de Gaulle and Winston Churchill were charismatic. It is because both were talented orators. Churchill's speeches are still considered standard sparkling journalism and de Gaulle's are regarded as one of the best specimens of the French literary style. Now take any speech delivered by a Ukrainian politician. You will never be able to identify it with a specific person, let alone attribute a statement to a certain politician. It is as though everything were said by the same individual bored by the tediousness of his own verbiage. Empty phraseology which is like a maze concealing whoever is behind it. This is bad for any political image.

  Ivan MALKOVYCH, poet:
Generally not, but one must remember that the culture of the language we have in Parliament reflects the linguistic culture of the people as a whole. I think that in terms of percentage the results would tally. Also, there are politicians who have no language problems: Marchuk, Lavrynovych, Musiyaka, and Moroz. Good command of Ukrainian is gradually becoming a hallmark of belonging to the intelligentsia. Yet in a society where most are just struggling to survive, in our bazaar relationships, brutal words have to be used. In our times language just like people has no basis to become more refined.

Interviewed by The Day's Lesia GANZHA, Serhiy VAYSILIEV, and Dmytro DESIATERYK
 
 

Delimiter 468x90 ad place

Subscribe to the latest news:

Газета "День"
read