Skip to main content
На сайті проводяться технічні роботи. Вибачте за незручності.

The Reverse of the Shevchenko Monument

10 March, 00:00
Taras Shevchenko is a symbolic figure for Ukraine. The fact that politicians gladly use this symbol, unfortunately, is not surprising for many. Simultaneously, in the villages connected with Shevchenko’s name, as well as in many other Ukraine’s villages, children study in dark and cold classrooms, while the Shevchenko History cum Culture Preserve has not yet received national status. Director of the Taras Shevchenko’s Motherland History cum Culture Preserve Liudmyla SHEVCHENKO told The Day ’s correspondent Yuliya KATSUN about Shevchenko’s anniversaries celebrations in the preserve: “We receive various delegations. On March 4 we hold a solemn meeting and concert in the village of Shevchenkove (formerly Kerelivka), attended, among others, by our governor Vadym Lioshenko. On Tuesday we received Verkhovna Rada Speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn and a group of people’s deputies, in part, Cherkasy Oblast representative Serhiy Tereshchuk. When we are visited by the head of Verkhovna Rada, this means certain level of attention... Unfortunately, things are much worse regarding material support of the preserve... “We have long spoken about granting the preserve, which includes three villages of Taras’s childhood (Moryntsi, Kerelivka, and Budyshchy) national status. However, this still remains only talk. I believe these places deserve to bear the name of national preserve, and we will achieve this.” Meanwhile, in Kyiv the Shevchenko Days celebrations were aimed at the goal, completely different from commemorating the great Kobzar...

After the scandalous events of March 9, 2001, when a rally to commemorate Taras Shevchenko resulted in violent clashes of protesters with the police, each new anniversary of the poet’s birthday in Kyiv is awaited if not with apprehension then certainly with interest. After 2001, Shevchenko’s birthday became a sort of test for the opposition forces, a test for their ability to rally their supporters and form their political platform. Thus, to prevent the opposition’s burning desire to gather on March 9 near the Shevchenko Monument by sculptor Manizer together with the country’s leadership from developing into clashes with the police, the scenario of this year’s commemorative events was planned so as to prevent even the smallest scuffles. The traffic jam created by a column of opposition supporters in the Shevchenko Boulevard does not count, since traffic jams are not a rare occurrence in today’s Kyiv.

The column of the especially active Shevchenko devotees was noticeably bisected, the smaller part formed by opposition leaders Viktor Yushchenko, Yuliya Tymoshenko, and Oleksandr Moroz with their entourage and bodyguards. Most of the rally was made up of cheerful students. To ask them about the reasons for their support for the Party of Homeland Defenders, whose slogans they carried, would be a throwaway question. This division in the ranks caught the eye more than the demonstrative gatherings of Moroz, Yushchenko, and Tymoshenko supporters in the nearby side streets. The scene of the columns merging together down the street was not overly impressive either.

The leaders of the currently oppositionist forces were not overly concerned about the sparse turnout of their supporters on March 9. The number of protesters in Volodymyrska Street hardly exceed the number of the police officers who were brought just in case from nearby police precincts. A politician’s popularity among the voters is not measured by his ability to rally a crowd under the right slogans. Above all, the politician must have something to say to the people. From this perspective, March 9, 2004 turned out calm, as there were no new faces or ideas.

Delimiter 468x90 ad place

Subscribe to the latest news:

Газета "День"
read