• Українська
  • Русский
  • English
Where there is no law, but every man does what is right in his own eyes, there is the least of real liberty
Henry M. Robert

HUMAN RIGHTS

10 April, 1999 - 00:00

Statistics available to the Verkhovna Rada Ombudsman say that 461 inmates
have died in Ukrainian penitentiaries this year (vs. almost 2,000 last
year). The 1999 budget allocates only 8 kopiykas for upkeep per inmate.
One might assume that the state has come up with a new effective method
of combating crime. This and the fact that all prisons are jammed far beyond
their designed capacities. Ukraine's penitentiaries contain nearly 130,000
inmates practically doomed to starvation and death by epidemic. Even if
all of them are all criminals, they have the right to be treated like human
beings.

"Many inadmissible things take place in prisons, in conditions of utmost
social and psychological tension; these things are regarded by the Council
of Europe as tortures," The Day was told by Semen Hluzman, director
of the Ukrainian-US Human Rights Bureau. "The problem is that Ukraine's
penitentiary system corresponds to a country no longer in existence, the
Soviet Union. Given all the recent democratic innovations, the situation
has grown from bad to unbearably worse due to economic hardships. From
what I know, some 3000 inmates died of tuberculosis and dystrophy last
year. This cannot be ignored. People are let out of prison angry and sick
without any social guarantees. They become recidivists, committing other,
even more vicious crimes. In other words, our penitentiary system increases
crime. "There is, of course, a solution to this problem. Alternative punishment,
for example. This would save taxpayer's money and prevent a convict from
becoming a habitual criminal. Ukrainian lawmakers are so politicized that
they pay little attention if any to their fellow citizens. And one must
raise the issue of our prison inmates, people denied social contacts. I
saw prisons in other countries and what impressed me most is that there
are social workers at every penitentiary or mental asylum who handle every
inmate and maintain his social contacts. And their are other people on
staff who see to the inmate's education.

"In Ukraine, 50% of all convicts turn into hardened criminals. And the
general at the head of the Penitentiary Department (subordinated to the
Cabinet - O. P.) does not allow journalists to visit prisons instead of
giving them broad access so they could demand legal changes. Prison wardens
are not to blame for what is going on inside. They are simply soldiers
of the system.

"The lawmaker is to blame for Lukyanivska Penitentiary inmates waiting
their turn to sleep (like under Stalin). I think that our prison brutality
is largely explained by this. Prison guards are also in torturous conditions,
although different from those of the inmates. We have to start at the government
level."

The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture prepared and sent
to Ukraine a report on conditions in which people are kept in penitentiaries,
mental hospitals, and barracks, along with recommendations on how to correct
the shortcomings. Even though Ukraine does not seem overly concerned about
its responsibility for crowded detention cells, for bullying and harassment
in the army (a long-standing practice), or torment by hunger in Ukrainian
prisons. The danger of exposing to the world the state's treatment could
become a serious stimulus for action. Of course, this is the only solution
when the country is not interested in showing any initiative to change
its stated attitude on human rights. Yevhen YEVINTOV, member of
the European Committee and director of the Ukrainian Human Rights Center,
talks about ECPT which will mark its tenth anniversary this November.

The Day: Does the Committee report address specific cases
of human rights violations and suggest the transgressor's personal responsibility?

V. Y.: Yes, there are specific cases, albeit given in veiled
form due to the principle of confidentiality. The committee does not disclose
discrediting facts but lets the state correct its shortcomings. Information
can be disclosed only with the victim's consent. In any case, negotiations
are underway with the state not in conjunction with the report but for
the purpose of making the document public. Here all bargaining is out of
the question.

The Day: The convention says your committee deals with authorities
supervising places of confinement. Who is to be made answerable for transgressions,
if and when detected?

V. Y.: This is something to be decided by the state, not by this
or that authority. Some of the latter are unwilling to cooperate, but this
happens everywhere, East and West alike. The committee deals with the state
through the Foreign Ministry and the report is addressed there. If the
state refuses to improve the situation the committee may issue a statement,
including whatever facts it deems necessary to make public. This is a powerful
moral and political sanction against the state, and this may, of course,
cause CE political sanctions.

The Day: Could an ordinary citizen's request lead the committee
to make a regular or ad hoc inspection (e.g., by visiting or supplying
incriminating information)?

V. Y.: Of course. Statements from citizens are accepted and they
help during inspections, although the committee most actively cooperates
with nongovernmental organizations in Ukraine. I am in no position to identify
them. I don't think that the state would resort to repression, but we adhere
to the principle of confidentiality just in case.

The Day: Almost as soon as the convention was ratified the
question arose how it would be implemented in Ukraine. We do not have any
laws defining torture as inhuman or humiliating treatment and punishment.
Is it important for the national legislation to have this definition?

V. Y.: Even the convention doesn't define it. European Court
precedents define torture as deliberate inhuman treatment causing severe
suffering; inhuman treatment is interpreted as causing intensive physical,
or moral suffering; humiliating conduct is explained as misconduct aimed
at causing the victim to experience fear, grief, or inferiority, resulting
in humiliation or insult, committed to overcome physical or moral resistance.
Now torture and inhuman treatment are similar notions, although varying
in intensity.

The Day: Not so long ago all of us in Ukraine discussed a
soccer match, rather the police conduct during it, which was watched by
all Europe. I witnessed a policeman drag a lawbreaker, brandishing his
truncheon. Are such actions condemned by the committee? What should ordinary
citizens do in a situation like this?

V. Y.: Of course, such conduct is impermissible. The victim should
sue the police in the first place, referring to the European conventions
and European Court of Human Rights, and notify the committee. This information
will be taken into account.

The Day: The convention says the committee must consider the
demands of national legislation. At the same time the Cabinet decreed that
information relating to persons sentenced to death should be kept secret.
Our newspaper was even denied information about the President's Pardon
Commission. What should the committee do under the circumstances?

V. Y.: In this context national legislation requirements imply
human rights laws. In case of transgressions the committee will override
any restrictions. Besides, I consider that this Cabinet decision contradicts
your national legislation. The laws on state secrets and information have
it that no data relating to human rights can be kept secret. In addition,
Ukraine failed to honor its commitment to abolish capital punishment, so
its citizens are today in the so-called death corridor - I mean those on
death row. This is contrary to European postulates. Ukraine will have to
make its stand on the matter clear.

By Oksana PANCHENKO, The Day

FROM THE DAY'S FILES

In the first half of 1998, a total of 76,285 persons were imprisoned,
including 5,046 women; 43,055 (3,711 women) received a second term; 4 were
condemned for crimes against the state; 18,466 (1,323) for killing; 3,172
(20) for rape; 1,047 (12) died in jail. Terms up to one year: 5,079 (633);
1-2 years: 16,817 (1,674); 2-3 years: 30,981 (2,593); 3-5 years: 57,375
(3,759); 5-8 years: 40,269 (2,190); 8-10 years: 15,586 (655); 10-15 years:
13,833 (510); over 15 years: 106 (2). Of these 99,754 (8,903) received
their first terms. Last year's amnesty released 35,610 inmates.

 

Rubric: